SELECTED ORDERS OF ITAT
|
|
Vol. 20, Part 6, for the week
March 25 - March 31, 2008 |
List of Cases
Dy. CIT v. Lyka Labs Ltd. (Mum.)
subject index
Chargeable as
- Assessment year 1998-99 - Whether a receipt
can be said to be capital receipt when it is relatable to transfer of capital
asset other than stock-in-trade and that parting of capital asset must be in a
sense that transferor cannot make any gain out of same either for ever or for
an enduring period - Held, yes - Assessee had been in business of
manufacturing of various drugs and formulations and sale thereof as well as
marketing of Nitro Glycerine based
formulations/products manufactured by a company ‘S’ - It had a huge distribution
network for marketing its own manufactured product as well as products
manufactured by other parties - In course of such business, it came to possess
certain marketing information relating to Nitro Glyce-rine
based formulations - A foreign company ‘U’ was also engaged in manufacture of
Nitro Glycerine based formulations and it intended to
market its products in India - To facilitate its marketing process, it entered
into an agreement with assessee to procure certain information relating to
Nitro Glycerine based formulations - During previous
year, assessee received certain amount from company ‘U’ on two accounts - (i) for transferring marketing information relating
to formulations made from bulk Nitro Glycerine for
period of three years, and (ii) for not competing with ‘U’ in promoting,
distributing and selling activities of such formulations for period of five
years - Consideration received was composite one and no apportionment was made
in respect of above activities - Assessee claimed deduction of said receipt on
ground that it was a capital receipt - Whether since assessee had simply parted
with information relating to marketing of Nitro Glycerine
formulations for a period of three years only without affecting its
trading/marketing structure, imparting of such information did not amount to
transfer of capital asset - Held, yes - Whether therefore, payment
allocable to such business of imparting of information amounted to revenue
receipt chargeable to tax - Held, yes - Whether payment relatable to
non-compete covenant amounted to capital receipt, inasmuch as there was a loss
of source of income to assessee from marketing of Nitro Glycerine
based products for a period of five years - Held, yes - Dy. CIT v. Lyka
Labs Ltd. (Mum.)
Method of
accounting
Change of
- Assessment year 1998-99 - Whether in view of
amended provisions of section 145 effective from 1-4-1997, an assessee is
permitted to follow either cash system of accounting or mercantile system of
accounting - Held, yes - Dy. CIT
v. Lyka Labs Ltd. (Mum.)
Income-tax Act,
1961
- Section 28(i)
- Section 145
MAGAZINE
features
landmark
rulings
v.k.
subramani (Chartered
Accountant)
- An analysis of Landmark ITAT’s rulings reported in Volume 110 of ITD and Volumes 19 & 20 of SOT