|
n
Residential
status - A person will become an ordinarily resident only
if (a) he has been residing in nine out of ten preceding years; and
(b) he has been in India for at least 730 days in previous seven years
(SC) - Pradip J. Mehta v.
Commissioner of Income-tax [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4291 OF 2002]
n
Educational institutions - Basic
requirement of section 10(22) is existence of educational purposes,
that is, imparting of education by way of teaching or training, etc. -
Commissioner
of Income-tax v. Assam State Book Production & Publication Corpn.
Ltd - [2008]
169 TAXMAN 19 (GAU.)
[IT
APPEAL NOS. 88 OF 2003, 7 TO 10, 12, 15 TO 21, 23 AND 24 OF 2004]

-
Assessee-company, doing activities
of preparing, printing, production, publication, sale, supply of text
books, supplementary books, etc., could not be considered as an
educational institution and, consequently, it was not entitled to
deduction under section 10(22)
-
Commissioner
of Income-tax v. Assam State Book Production & Publication Corpn.
Ltd - [2008]
169 TAXMAN 19 (GAU.) [IT
APPEAL NOS. 88 OF 2003, 7 TO 10, 12, 15 TO 21, 23 AND 24 OF 2004]

n
Return
of income - Question as to whether return is to be filed in a
particular Form or not is to be decided by statutory authority and not
by Court - Union
of India v. Income-tax Bar Asscn - [2008]
169 TAXMAN 38 (SC)[Civil
Appeal No. 5941 of 2007] 
-
Where
High
Court permitted assessees to file income-tax returns in Form Saral 2-D
instead of Forms ITR-1 to ITR-8 due to paucity of time and
non-availability of adequate number of forms, since time for filing
return in prescribed Form had been extended, impugned order was to be
set aside and all assessees, who had already filed return in Form
Saral 2-D pursuant to impugned order, were to be directed to file
return in prescribed Form till extended date -Union
of India v. Income-tax Bar Asscn - [2008]
169 TAXMAN 38 (SC)
[Civil
Appeal No. 5941 of 2007] 
n
Settlement
Commission - There cannot be a fresh application in respect of
same subject-matter, if first application is rejected after assuming
jurisdiction, as Settlement Commission is a quasi-judicial authority -
Haji
N. Abdulla .v. Income-tax Settlement Commission - [2008]
169 TAXMAN 98 (BOM.)
[Writ
Petition No. 1427 of 2007] 
|