|
n
Depreciation
- Value determined by DVO could not be construed to be correct value for
allowing depreciation - Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ashok
Leyland Finance Ltd. [IT APPEAL NOS. 1104 TO 1106 AND 1218 TO 1220 (MAD) OF
2005]
n
Block
assessment in search cases - Burden
to prove that property in question stood in a benami name and assessee was
its real owner, was on revenue and it having failed to discharge its said
onus, assessment in name of assessee was not justified - Assistant
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Peter Thorose [IT Appeal No. 89 (Gauhati) of
2005]
n
Business
Income - Where assessee made ancillary object as its main object, income
earned by assessee was to be treated as its business income and not
otherwise - Sujay
Trading (P.) Ltd. v Joint Commissioner of Income-tax [IT
APPEAL NO. 4348 (MUM.) OF 2001]
n
Charitable
or religious trust - In
order to serve a charitable purpose, it is not necessary that object of
assessee-trust should be to benefit whole of mankind or all persons living
in a Country or State; it will be more than sufficient if its intention is
to benefit a section of public as distinguished from specified
individuals - Rajkot Visha Shrimali Jain Samaj v. Income-tax
Officer [IT
Appeal No. 158 (rajkot) of 2006]
n
Income
from house property - A lessee can be treated to be owner of property,
if lease is for a considerable long time, say for 99 years, and lessee has
right to construct property and to sell property constructed by him
- Bindals
Developers (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer
[IT
Appeal No. 468 (Delhi) of 2005]
n
Maintenance
of accounts by certain persons carrying on profession or business -
For applicability of section 44AA(2), circumstance that Assessing Officer
was unable to compute income of assessee due to non-maintenance of
accounts must exist and without completing assessment, Assessing Officer
cannot come to conclusion that he was unable to compute income of assessee
due to non-maintenance of accounts ; therefore, as per section 44AA(2)
only after completion of assessment, Assessing Officer may initiate
proceedings for levy of penalty under section 271A - C.H.
Aboobacker Haji v.Income-tax Officer [IT
APPEAL NO. 293 (COCHin) OF 2006]
n
Annual
value - Income from house property cannot be computed on basis of
enhanced rent which tenants agreed to pay after close of previous year
- Smt.
Anita M. Shah v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
[IT Appeal
Nos. 2967, 2968, 5763 to 5766 (Mum.) of 2005]
n
Assessment
in case of search on requisition - Provisions of section 153A are only
applicable in case valid search is conducted against assessee under section
132 - J.M.
Trading Corpn. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax [IT
APPEAL NOS. 1435 TO 1438 AND 2629 (MUM.) OF 2007]
n
Capital
gains
: Exemption under section 54 - Requirement
of section 54 is that assessee should acquire a residential house within
period of one year before or two years after date on which transfer took
place and source of funds is quite irrelevant inasmuch as it is not
necessary that same funds must be utilized for purchase of another
residential house
- Assistant
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Dr. P.S. Pasricha [IT
Appeal No. 6808 (Mum.) of 2003]
n
Charitable
or religious trust - If Form
No. 10 is filed, benefit of accumulation of income for charitable purpose
cannot be denied - Additional
Director of Income-tax v. Manav Bharati Child Institute & Child
Psychology [IT APPEAL
NO. 512 (DELHI) OF 2006]
n
Income
from other sources - In
order to apply provisions of section 59(1) read with section 41(1) to
computation of income from other sources, liability in respect of which any
cessation or remission takes place during year has to be of nature similar
to trading liability in respect of which deduction was allowed in earlier
years in computing taxable income under head 'Income from other sources'
- Income-tax Officer v. Smt.
Kavita Khurana
[IT
APPEAL NO. 1474 (DELHI) OF 2004]
n
80-IB
Deductions - Manufacturing
process should be construed as comprising of procurement of raw materials,
processing thereof and generation of finished products and persons involved
in all these three processes have to be treated as employed in manufacturing
process - Shree Par Fragrance (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer [IT
Appeal No. 5549 (Mum.)
of 2007]
-
A factory manager and his assistant
looking after various activities of a unit and being ultimately responsible
for production results would be considered as workers employed in
manufacturing process for purpose of section 80-IB -
Shree Par Fragrance (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer [IT
Appeal No. 5549 (Mum.)
of 2007]
|