Security agency’s services
CESTAT MUMBAI BENCH
The Commander Security Services
v.
MR. JYOTI
BALASUNDARAM, VICE-PRESIDENT
AND A.K.
SRIVASTAVA, TECHNICAL MEMBER
S/534/WZB/MUM/2007/CSTB/CI
APPLICATION
NO. ST/S/1047/07
IN APPEAL NO.
ST/101/07
August 7, 2007
Section
65 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Security agency’s services - Original authority
had demanded service tax of Rs. 1848.63 from assessee under category of
security agency - Commissioner (Appeals) had directed assessee to pre deposit
Rs. 4,50,000 for non-compliance of same, appeal of assessee was to be dismissed
- Whether since assessee had been registered with service tax department as
security agency, there was no prima facie case exist for total waiver of
pre-deposit - Held, yes - Whether since assessee had already paid a sum of Rs. 1
lakh, it was further to be directed to deposit Rs. 1 lakh and on such deposit,
pre-deposit of balance amount of duty and penalty would be waived - Held, yes
[Para 2]