Click here to Login
Move Left
Comprehensive Risk Management Framework for the cash market - Circular No.MRD/DOP/SE/Cir-13/2008, dated 5-5-2008       Establishment of Connectivity with both depositories NSDL and CDSL – Companies eligible for shifting from Trade for Trade Segment (TFTS) to Rolling Segment - Circular No. MRD/DOP/SE/Cir-12/08, dated 5-5-2008       Notification on Real Estate Mutual Fund Schemes and Initial Issue Expenses - Circular No. SEBI/IMD/CIR No.4/124477/08, dated 2-5-2008       Clarification on deduction of tax at source (TDS) on service tax component on rental income under section 194-I of the Income-tax Act - Circular No. 4/2008, dated 28-4-2008       Service charge on Monetary Transactions - Press Release dated 29-4-2008       Text of further proposed Amendments to Finance Bill, 2008       Analysis of further proposed Amendments to Finance Bill, 2008       FM Speech in Lok Sabha on 29-4-2008       Annual Policy Statement for the Year 2008-09 by Dr. Y. Venugopal Reddy, Governor, Reserve Bank of India       Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2008       Sebi Notification on Real Estate Mutual Fund Schemes (REMFS) - Press Release No. 101/2008, dated 25-4-2008       Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) (Amendment) Regulations, 2008 - Notification F. No. LAD-NRO/GN/2008/03/123042, dated 16-4-2008
Move Right
 
  CORPORATE TAX LAWS
DAILY CASE LAW REPORTER
Now Covering 159 Cases
 
 
G. S. Bhatta v. Sirius Shipping Co. Ltd. [C. A. No. 27 of 2007]
 
Section 403, read with sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 - Interim order by Tribunal - On application under sections 397/398 an interim order was passed directing respondents to maintain status quo in regard to shareholding - Respondent company moved an application to High Court for amalgamation with company ‘T’ - Petitioner, thus, filed instant application submitting that act of respondent amounted to willful disobey of orders of Bench - It was further submitted that company had accepted share application money of Rs. 26.19 crore pending for allotment, which had been taken into account to arrive at valuation of shares of company, and in that process value of applicant’s share would get reduced, thus, respondents, having willfully disobeyed order dated 12-12-2005, must be prosecuted in accordance with law - Whether in view of fact that no further share had been issued pursuant to interim order, mere treatment of money lying in share application pending allotment as shares capital for determining value of shares of company would in no way be violative of orders of Bench - Held, yes - Whether, further, having regard to fact that existing share holders of company including applicant would be allotted shares upon sanction of scheme in ‘T’ Limited in ratio as envisaged in scheme which was pending consideration of High Court, it was clear that share holding pattern of company remained unchanged and applicant merely apprehended that same would be changed as and when company would be merged with ‘T’ Limited - Held, yes - Whether mere apprehension would not go in aid of applicant, thus, there had been no disobedience of order at instance of respondents and, consequently, application for contempt was to be closed - Held, yes More
 
 
About Us | Contact Us | Copyright | Tan Prints | Payment Terms | Legal Disclaimer | FeedBack | Dealers
All text & media on these pages are copyright of TAXMANN PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Site Best Viewed on IE 5X with 1024 X 768  resolution
Site Designed and maintained by Taxmann Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 
Book Store | Online Cds & Software | Digital Signature Certificate | Demo | Sample Journals | Book Manufacturing | Software Development | Email | Tax Magazine | Books Store | E-books Store | Income Tax | Law | Software | Income Tax Return | Income Tax | Tax Magazine | Statutory Happening | Judicial Happening | Direct Tax Laws | Corporate Laws | Service Tax