AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI

Bank of India, In re

 

 

Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Minimum alternate tax - Assessment year 1997-98 – Applicant-bank filed return in respect of assessment year 1997-98 showing nil income – But in accordance with provisions of section 115JA applicant bank computed book profit and paid applicable taxes on that amount - While computing said book profit, applicant did not include in same provision for taxation made by its foreign branches under tax laws of those countries for reason that under clause (a) of Explanation to sub-section (2) of section 115JA only provision made for payment of income-tax under Act is contemplated and not provision in respect of income-tax paid or payable in foreign countries - Department, however, added to said book profit provision for taxation made by foreign branches of applicant under tax laws of those countries on ground that section 115JA makes no distinction between income-tax payable in India and that payable abroad - Whether order of department was justified - Held, yes

Words and phrases: ‘Income-tax’ as occurring in section 115JA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Circulars and Notifications: Circular No. 495 dated 22-9-1987 ; Circular No. 763 dated 18-2-1998.

 

FACTS

Applicant bank filed return in respect of the assessment year 1997-98 showing nil income. But in accordance with provisions of section 115JA, applicant bank computed book profit and paid applicable taxes on that amount.  While computing said book profit, the applicant had not included in same provision for taxation made by its foreign branches under the tax laws of those countries for the reason that under clause (a) of Explanation to sub-section (2) of section 115JA only provision made for payment of income-tax under the Act is contemplated and not provision in respect of income-tax paid or payable in foreign countries.  The department, however, added to said book profit provision for taxation made by foreign branches of the applicant under tax laws of those countries on ground that section 115JA makes no distinction between income-tax payable in India and that payable abroad.  On the direction of the Committee of Disputes, the applicant has sought for ruling on the question as to whether provision for taxation made by the foreign branches of the applicant bank under tax laws of those countries is required to be added to book profits in terms of section 115JA.

HELD

Sub-section (1) of section 115JA begins with a non-obstante clause. The opening words of this sub-section are - 'Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act'. Sub-section (4), at the end of this section, says that save as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to every company, mentioned in this section. A careful reading of section 115JA shows that so far as determination of book profit and the liability to pay minimum tax based on book profit is concerned, this section is a self-contained code. Therefore, in determining book profits and deemed income, it prevails over other provisions of the Act. The section provides for levy of tax on certain companies by deeming certain percentage of their book profit as taxable income in relation to the assessment years 1997-98 to 2000-01. According to this provision, if the total income of a company is less than 30 per cent of its book profit, then 30 per cent of such book profit shall be deemed to be the taxable income of that company. Sub-section (2) of section 115JA requires a company to prepare its profit and loss account in accordance with the provisions of Part-ll and III of Schedule-VI to the Companies Act, 1956. The Explanation to this sub-section states that book profit means net profit as shown in the profit and loss account, as increased, inter alia, by the amount of income-tax paid or payable and the provision made for the same. The CBDT Circular No. 763 dated 18-2-1998 elaborating the scope of this section, states that the number of companies either paying no taxes or paying marginal taxes has of late increased. Therefore, section 115JA has been inserted so as to levy minimum tax on such companies. It is noticed that prior to insertion of section 115JA, a similar provision for levying minimum tax on book profit, namely, section 115J, had been made from the assessment year 1989-90, but was discontinued from the assessment year 1991-92. Explaining the reasons behind the incorporation of the said provision, CBDT Circular No. 495 dated 22-9-1987 stated that it was an accepted cannon of taxation to levy taxes on the basis of the ability to pay. As a result of various tax concessions and incentives, certain companies making huge profits and also declaring substantial dividends had been managing their affairs in such a way as to avoid payment of income-tax. Accordingly, as a measure of equity, section 115J was introduced. The purpose behind the enactment of sections 115J and 115JA remains essentially the same and these circulars state the same reasons, albeit in slightly different languages, for enactment of the provisions.  [Para 5]

The Circular No. 495 dated 22-9-1987 nowhere differentiates between income earned in India and that earned abroad. It also does not indicate that the ability to pay tax would be the post tax ability. Above all, the said circular is only an elucidation by the executive authorities of the reasons behind the enacting section 115J. The CBDT circulars dated 22-9-1987 and 18-2-1998 cannot serve as an aid to interpret the statutory provisions made in this regard. Section 115JA speaks of 'book profit' as increased by income-tax paid or payable. For the purpose of calculating the 'book profit', the assessee has to prepare profit and loss account as per Parts II and III of Schedule-VI to the Companies Act. These provisions require the assessee to disclose every material feature while preparing profit and loss account, so that it clearly reflects the result of the working of the company as a whole. The profit and loss account has to set out various items relating to the income and expenditure of the company arranged in the most convenient way. Amounts of income-tax payable in India and abroad are to be separately shown, as also the amount of relief from the Indian income-tax. Amounts set aside to provisions made for meeting specific liabilities, contingencies, commitments and also amounts withdrawn therefrom are also to be shown. The net profit is arrived at as per the profit and loss account by taking into account the profit made by the foreign branches as well. Thus the profit earned by foreign branches is an integral part of the net profit. 30 per cent of net profit so arrived at shall be deemed to be the total income of the assessee for the relevant previous year. The main part of the Explanation to section 115JA(2) defines book profit and immediately thereafter ordains under clause (a) that income-tax paid or payable for which provision has been made in profit and loss account, shall be added to the net profit.    In the context in which clause (a) of the Explanation occurs, the expression ‘income-tax’ in clause (a) should be referable to profits reflected in profit and loss account.  [Para 7]

Section 2 which is a definition or interpretation section, starts with the expression ‘unless the context otherwise requires’. Modern statutes invariably contain an interpretation or definition section which defines the main terms and expressions repeatedly used in the statute. When a statute defines a particular term or expression, it is that definition which has to be taken for construing the meaning of that term or expression, wherever it occurs in the statute. Normally, it would not be permissible to construe it in any other manner. In other words, once an expression is defined in the Act, that expression wherever it occurs in the Act, rules or notifications, made thereunder, should be understood in the same sense, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context. At the same time, it is also a settled position of law that even where an Act contains a definition section, it does not necessarily apply in all the contexts in which a defined word may be used. If a defined expression is used in a context in which the definition would not fit, the context must be allowed to prevail over the definition clause, and the word must be given its contextual meaning. It is for this reason that the definition or interpretation section generally contains an expression similar to the one used at the beginning of section 2.  The expression 'income-tax' is used in section 115JA in a general sense, and not with reference to the income-tax chargeable under the provisions of the Act alone. No distinction between Indian and foreign income- tax can be drawn by reference to section 2 (43) which defines "tax". The contextual setting of clause (a) of Explanation to sub-section (2) of section 115JA has to be kept in view. If so, there is no justification to restrict the scope of the expression ‘income- tax’ to Indian income- tax only.  [Para 8]

As the applicant is a resident of India, income earned by its branches abroad would also be chargeable to tax under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 5.  [Para 9]

In the light of the above, the provision made by the foreign branches of the applicant for payment of income-tax in those countries, is required to be added to book profit in terms of section 115JA.  [Para 11]