AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY
FINANCE BILL, 2008 AT A GLANCE
Section |
Effective date of proposed amendment |
Nature of proposed amendment |
Effect of proposed amendment |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
CUSTOMS ACT |
|||
|
28B |
|
Sub-section (1A) proposed to be
inserted; certain words proposed to be substituted in sub-sections (2) and
(4) |
New sub-section (1A) is
proposed to be inserted in section 28B to enable the Central Government to
recover any amount collected by any person representing as duty of customs in
excess of the duty assessed or determined or paid on any goods, and also to
recover any amount collected by any person as representing duty of customs on
any goods, which are wholly exempt or are chargeable to nil rate of duty.
Accordingly, certain consequential amendments are proposed to be made in
sub-sections (2) and (4) of the section 28B. |
|
108(1) |
13-7-2006 |
Certain words proposed to be
omitted |
Section 108 is proposed to be
amended so as to omit the words "duly empowered by the Central
Government in this behalf from sub-section (1) of the said section with a
view to give powers to all Customs Officers to issue summons. |
|
117 |
|
Certain words proposed to be
substituted |
Section 117 is proposed to be
amended so as to increase the maximum amount of penalty for contravention of
any provision of the Act from existing ten thousand rupees to one lakh
rupees, where no express penalty is provided elsewhere. |
|
129A(2) |
|
Proviso and Explanation
proposed to be inserted |
Sub-section (2) of section 129A
is proposed to be amended by inserting a proviso so as to provide that in
case the Committee of Commissioners of Customs differs in its opinion on the
order passed in an appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals), it shall refer the
matter to the jurisdictional Chief Commissioner who shall consider the facts
of the case and the points of difference and if he is of the opinion that the
order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) is not legal or proper, direct the
proper officer to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against the order of the
Commissioner (Appeals). The jurisdictional Chief Commissioner shall be the
Chief Commissioner having jurisdiction over the adjudicating authority who
has decided the case. |
|
129D |
|
Proviso proposed to be inserted
in sub-section (1); sub-section (3) proposed to be substituted |
Section 129D is proposed to be
amended with a view to,— (i) insert a proviso to
sub-section (1) so as to provide that in case of the Committee of Chief
Commissioners of Customs differs in its opinion about the legality or
propriety of the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs as an
adjudicating authority, it shall refer the matter to the Board which shall
consider the facts of the case and the difference between them and if it is
of the opinion that the order passed by the Commissioner is not legal or
proper, direct the Commissioner or any other Commissioner to appeal to the
Appellate Tribunal against the order. (ii) substitute
sub-section (3) to provide that every order under sub-section (1) or
sub-section (2) of section 129D shall be made within a period of three months
from the date of communication of the decision or the order of the
adjudicating authority. The proposed amendment is of consequential nature in
view of amendment of sub-section (1) of section 129D. |
|
129EE |
|
Proposed to be inserted |
New section 129EE is proposed
to be inserted to provide for payment of interest in case of delayed refund
of amount deposited by the appellant in pursuance of the order of the
Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal, when the decision is in
favour of the appellant. It provides that in case the amount is not refunded
within three months from the communication of the order of the appellate
authority, unless the order of the appellate authority is stayed by a
superior court or tribunal, interest at the rate specified in section 27A
shall be paid after the expiry of three months from the communication of the
order of the appellate authority till the date of refund of the amount. |
|
141 |
|
Section proposed to be numbered
as sub-section (1) and after sub-section (1) so renumbered sub-section (2)
proposed to be inserted |
Section 141 is proposed to be
amended so as to regulate the manner in which the imported or export goods
may be received, stored, delivered, dispatched or otherwise handled in a
customs area by any person and to specify by regulations the responsibilities
of persons engaged in the aforesaid activities. |
|
158(2)(ii) |
|
Proposed to be substituted |
Section 158 is proposed to be
substituted so as to increase the maximum amount of penalty for contravention
of any of the rules from five hundred rupees to fifty thousand rupees, and
also to increase the maximum amount of penalty from two hundred rupees to
fifty thousand rupees for contravention of regulations. |
CUSTOMS TARIFF ACT |
|||
|
First Schedule/Second Schedule |
|
Proposed to be amended |
The First Schedule is proposed
to be amended in the manner specified in the Second Schedule with a view to
enhance the rate of duty on certain items. The Second Schedule is proposed
to be amended to the Customs Tariff Act in the manner specified in the Third
Schedule with a view to increase export duty on chromium ores and
concentrates. |